BANJIR69: Situs Toto Slot Gacor Terbaik & Login Situs Togel Resmi

Dijual Oleh BANJIR69

BANJIR69: Situs Toto Slot Gacor Terbaik & Login Situs Togel Resmi

BANJIR69 merupakan salah satu platform situs toto slot gacor terbaik di Indonesia yang memberikan akses login yang mempermudah untuk para member mendaftar di situs togel resmi. Yang senantiasa membayar kemenangan anda secara penuh. Banyak sekali keuntungan bonus-bonus hadiah yang menakjubkan yang akan diperoleh ketika bergabung bersama situs kami . Jelajahi dunia toto togel yang menyenangkan di situs toto unggulan terbaik di BANJIR69.

Rp.5.000
Rp.100.000-95%
Kuantitas

Layanan Pelanggan

Jelajahi Lazada

Go where your heart beats
Download the App

Metode Pembayaran

Jasa Pengiriman

Lazada Logistics JNE Ninja Express GoSend Sicepat Grab Parcel J & T anter SAP

Lazada Southeast Asia

Follow Us

fb linkin yt pnt ins tw tiktok Lazada Blg
© Lazada 2024

Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/ojs302/lib/pkp/includes/bootstrap.inc.php:45) in /var/www/html/ojs302/lib/pkp/classes/session/SessionManager.inc.php on line 59

Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /var/www/html/ojs302/lib/pkp/includes/bootstrap.inc.php:45) in /var/www/html/ojs302/lib/pkp/classes/session/SessionManager.inc.php on line 59

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/ojs302/lib/pkp/includes/bootstrap.inc.php:45) in /var/www/html/ojs302/plugins/citationFormats/refMan/RefManCitationPlugin.inc.php on line 54

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/ojs302/lib/pkp/includes/bootstrap.inc.php:45) in /var/www/html/ojs302/plugins/citationFormats/refMan/RefManCitationPlugin.inc.php on line 55
TY - JOUR AU - Ribeiro, Anderson Luiz AU - Ribeiro, Carlos Barbosa AU - Naves, Raphael de Andrade PY - 2022/12/22 TI - ANÁLISE DA ADI 6764/DF SOB A ÓTICA DO PROCESSO JURISDICIONAL BRASILEIRO JF - Episteme Transversalis; v. 13 n. 3 (2022): ENGENHARIAS: Pesquisas e Projetos KW - N2 - No contexto da pandemia de COVID-19, o Presidente da República ajuizou, perante o Supremo Tribunal Federal, a ação direta de inconstitucionalidade (ADI) 6764/DF, impugnando decretos expedidos por governadores de estados que haviam determinado a adoção de medidas restritivas, como o fechamento de atividades não essenciais e toque de recolher. Sob a ótica das normas que regem o processo constitucional brasileiro, o presente estudo faz uma breve discussão sobre a decisão monocrática proferida pelo relator, Ministro Marco Aurélio de Mello, o qual indeferiu a petição inicial. Assim, buscou-se apoio metodológico na legislação, na doutrina e na jurisprudência, com o propósito de apresentar os principais aspectos técnicos de tal ação constitucional e promover discussão sobre a aderência – ou não – de tal decisão ao posicionamento historicamente adotado pela Suprema Corte. Por fim, concluiu-se que a decisão monocrática desrespeitou as normas fundamentais do processo jurisdicional brasileiro, afastando-se das interpretações anteriormente exaradas pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal. Abstract In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the President of the Republic filed a direct action of unconstitutionality (ADI) 6764/DF in the Federal Supreme Court, challenging decrees issued by state governors that had determined the adoption of restrictive measures, such as the closure of non-essential activities and curfews. From the perspective of the norms that govern the Brazilian constitutional process, the present study makes a brief discussion about the monocratic decision rendered by the rapporteur, Minister Marco Aurélio de Mello, who rejected the initial petition. Thus, methodological support was sought in legislation, doctrine and jurisprudence, with the purpose of presenting the main technical aspects of such constitutional action and promoting discussion about the adherence - or not - of such decision to the position historically adopted by the Supreme Court. Finally, it was concluded that the monocratic decision disrespected the fundamental norms of the Brazilian judicial process, moving away from the interpretations previously issued by the Federal Supreme Court. UR - https://revista.ugb.edu.br/index.php/episteme/article/view/2666